Monday, May 16, 2011

Oh the horror!

New London Graduation Requirement:

Speak English

Only 16 percent of 10th graders test at the highest levels.


By LeAnne Gendreau


"Students in New London [CT] will not only have to pass English to graduate, but they will have to prove that they know the American English language and be able to demonstrate it as of 2015."


The next thing you know they'll want them to be able to do math and know history!  Oh the horror!  The humanity!  


How long until the ACLU fights this? 

How did this get through the Obama policy censors at CBS...?

Wednesday, May 04, 2011

Belated Congratulations to Our Special Forces AND President Obama

Yes.  I said it.  Congratulations to our Special Forces and President Obama.  It has been a week of great emotion regarding the killing of Osama/Usama bin Laden.  My first reaction was, "We finally got the bastard."  Then I heard about the burial at sea and got suspicious.  I am now thoroughly convinced OBL is dead.  

Having said that, my next layer of thoughts pertained to, “How did they get him?”  I’ve read, watched and listened to the details of the operation, from the initial code name for the courier coming out a few years ago, to the spotting of the suspicious compound.  All I can say is I'm glad I'm on our side.  

As for the motivation of Obama to order this type of mission, I do believe he apparently does possess some ability to make the correct decisions for the good of the USA.  This is an ability I've been wondering doubt for some time.  It is important to know BHO has this capability, for reasons I'll get back to.  BHO also seems to be willing to take risk.  This was a politically risky move, no doubt about it.  Had the choppers crashed inside Pakistan or had they invaded a compound and killed people that turned out to be innocent civilians, this could have been the end of his presidency and been a very significant international fiasco.   This leads me to believe that despite it being a "gutsy" decision for Obama, he had to be completely convinced OBL was there and that the Special Forces had every contingency covered.  BHO does not make decisions like this quickly or easily.  I see there were reports it took him 16 hours to decide.  I'd say for this president, that is record speed.  I do not begrudge him for taking the time; it has to be a gut wrenching process of weighing all the options and ultimately being the guy on the hook for the success or failure of such an operation.  Barrack Hussein Obama made the right call.  Congratulations Mr. President!

Next, I have to congratulate the intelligence community.  I do not know how they do what they do, but I'm damn glad they do it for us and not them.  The fact that it took years of putting all the pieces of the puzzle together and that the information did not get ignored or confined to a specific agency was nothing less than a bureaucratic miracle.  Many people whose names will never be spoken touched, read, passed on the information that kept the information flow alive.

And, of course, the Special Forces (specifically Navy Seals Team 6, if reports are to be believed) community is simply amazing.  I am convinced they are far deadlier than have ever been portrayed in movies.  These are men of incredible resolve, intellect, bravery who have endured years of brutal training to become the best of the best.  I cannot put into words the esteem in which I hold them, other than to say I am simply in awe.  Congratulations men!  Congratulations from a grateful citizen.

I do believe that the Bush administration ought to be thanked.  It was the resolve of GHWB who put us on the trajectory to find OBL and bring him to justice, "dead or alive".  It was men like Rumsfeld who realized that our armed forced had to be rebuilt to face the reality of a new type of enemy.  Rummy had to turn that ship around ASAP and build up capabilities, some from the ground up, and divert budgets and resources to fight a war like we've never fought before.  It was sweeping action of the Bush administration that reversed Jamie Gorelick's idiotic FISA provision's that allowed 9/11 to occur in the first place. So, congratulations to the men & women who served in the Bush administration that allowed us to have the capabilities to even conduct such a mission to begin with...  If I were a crazy terrorist I would be scared to death of the U.S. because we finish what we start, even when our president’s change through our peaceful election process.

I have a couple more thoughts on this subject.  First, I am a little appalled by all the celebration regarding OBL's death.  Please don't misunderstand me; I am glad we are rid of what was the world's worst homicidal maniac.  But, I find the celebration is a little unseemly for two reasons.  I don't think we are necessarily safer because OBL is dead.  In fact, some would argue that we may now experience a spike in attacks.  We'll see.  Mainly, I hope we are not lulled into a false sense of security.  But, more importantly, I do not believe we should be seen as celebrating because it is simply in bad taste.  It is not humble behavior at all.  I believe it would have been better for the USA to be seen as simply finishing what it said it was going to do.  I don't ever remember John Wayne screaming, "Yippie!  I killed the bastard!"  The Duke simply blew the smoke from the barrel of his gun and re-holstered it, looking at the dead body with disdain and disgust as he got on his horse and rode away.  Classy.  Death, even that of a vile homicidal maniac should not be celebrated.  This war is not over.  

That leads me to my last train if thought regarding the death of OBL.  I am appalled by the lack of gratitude expressed by the "peaceful" Muslims around the world.  If, in fact, OBL represented a dishonest faction of Islam, then they ought to be glad to be rid of him and all he represented.  Aside from Saudi Arabia, no other Muslim country nor any "moderate/peaceful" Muslim leader has said that Islam is better off now that OBL is dead.  That, to me, is an ominous sign.  It leads me to believe that there may not be as many "peace-loving moderate" Muslims in the world.  Maybe, though they have never said so, they secretly reveled in the fact that OBL was able to elude the U.S. for so long. 

I believe we have seen the end of round one in the battle against radical Islamists.  Only time will tell if Islam is a religion of peace, as they say.  

I hope (and pray) for the best but, I am preparing for the worst.

Friday, April 29, 2011

Debt Ceiling, Smebt Ceiling.....

The Washington Post Opinions
Posted at 09:34 AM ET, 04/29/2011
By Jennifer Rubin

In sum, the Democratic Party has thrown overboard decades of tax ideology (“soak the rich”) and succumbed to the Republicans’ insistence that Keynesian spending must end and fiscal discipline must commence.

The White House has lost control of the fiscal debate and of its own party. (“The White House has condemned efforts to attach additional measures to the debt-ceiling issue. Press secretary Jay Carney has called it ‘a dangerous, risky idea to hold hostage . . . a vote on raising the debt ceiling to any other piece of legislation.’ ”) Now, the White House grudgingly accepts the prospect of spending conditions. I suppose this is, as they say, leading from behind.


I am trying to figure out Ms. Rubin's point.  Is she for the continued stimulus spending binge in Washington?  Does she think we should pass the deficit cap with no strings attached?  Maybe we should just eliminate the deficit cap altogether? 

I'll tell you what, Ms. Rubin.  Why don't you call your credit card company and tell them to remove the limit on your card.  Explain to them how by allowing you to spend ad infinitum, you will be able to take care of your family so much better and grow the economy.  You'll be able to provide a larger house (infrastructure), raise allowances (entitlements),  install some solar panels & a geothermal HVAC system (green technology) , sent all your relatives to Ivy League Schools (education) if only you did not have that nasty spending cap on your credit card.  Explain to them how the economy would grow if you got to build a bigger home, if they spent their allowances on products, how your expenses would decrease due to the solar panels & geo HVAC and how much more successful everyone would be if allowed to go to the best schools...   I'm sure they would lift the cap - no strings attached - right?

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Stupid Decisions Continue from the "Least Qualified Person in any Room He Walks Into"...

So, how is our POTUS, or as Rush Limbaugh and I prefer to call him, the "Least Qualified Person in any Room He Walks Into" doing on energy policy?  Let's take a look at how the MSM is portraying his action (or inaction, as the case may be)...

What can Obama do to bring down gas prices?

By Zachary Roth
Wed Apr 27, 11:19 am ET

Here's a rundown of what Obama might do to start bringing gas prices back to earth:
Invest more in renewable energy sources. In a radio address Saturday, Obama called this effort "the key to helping families at the pump and reducing our dependence on foreign oil."
End the $4 billion in subsidies for oil companies. "Instead of subsidizing yesterday's energy sources, we need to invest in tomorrow's,"Obama has said.
Root out fraud and manipulation in the oil markets. Obama has said he'll have a Justice Department task force probe whether oil market traders and speculators are "taking advantage of the American people for their own short-term gain."
Boost domestic oil production. "We don't want a repeat of the oil spill that we had in the Gulf last year," Obama said in an interview Tuesday. "But we've got to continue to make sure that U.S. production is strong." That might mean expanding drilling off the coast of Florida, or in Alaska.

Press oil-producing allies like Saudi Arabia to do their part. We need to "let them know," Obama said, "that it's not going to be good for the if our economy is hobbled because of high oil prices."
Work with automakers to increase fuel economy standards for cars and trucks. 
Still, none of these approaches looks likely to have an immediate impact when Americans fill up their tanks. Ending oil subsidies and instead boosting investments in renewables may be good long-term policy, but it would take years for consumers to start feeling the benefits of such shifts  at the pump. LIkewise, increasing  domestic production wouldn't bring prices down any time soon, while raising fuel economy standards is a long-term project requiring a serious buy-in from Congress. And most experts think manipulation of the oil markets account for only a very small part of the recent price spikes, so it's unlikely that cracking down on such practices will have a major impact. As for leaning on Saudi Arabia, the Saudis profit from high prices, so it's far from clear what leverage the United States may have to counter the Saudis' push for market dominance.



All that and nary a word on the one thing that would have the greatest impact on oil prices.   How about fixing our monetary policy?  Since oil is pegged to the dollar and the dollar continues to lose value maybe there is a connection, hmmmmm?  I bet yuan to donuts that George Soros is betting against the dollar and is helping to drive down the currency and thus inflating the price of oil.  Of course, the Chinese Yuan being worth $0.15 is what is driving China's economy which makes us competitors for the same limited supply of oil.  Unfortunately, they have a government whose only concern is China and because of this they have been going around the world buying up oil from places like Venezuela and Africa ...


Add to the stupid monetary policy the stupid ethanol policy and now you double down on higher food prices....  The ratio of the energy obtained from ethanol/energy expended from corn in the U.S. in its production is between 1.3-1.6.  Compare this to Brazil where they make their ethanol from sugar cane which contains far more energy per unit (8.3-10.2) and I'd say we are crazy to try to continue to direct corn from our food supply for such an incidental amount of energy....  But, the ethanol lobby is pretty strong....


And finally we have a no-new-oil-exploration and no-new-oil-leasing policy of our energy department.  We are pumping more of our own oil now, but these are on leases granted by the previous administration (as it can take 6-8 years to develop new wells)....  So where does that leave us in 6-8 years...?

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

"National Coverage Decisions" (NCD) = Death Panels...

Wow...  Is this for real?  If so, then NCD = the Death Panels everyone was talking about during the debate over Obamacare.  How can a federal agency arbitrarily set rules that trump the decision of the doctor who is actually there on the ground with the patient who may die if not given this course of action?  The rationing of healthcare is beginning and, as per usual, the winners are none other than the lawyers....  God help us....


Georgia hospitals facing federal investigation

by Randy Southerland, Contributing Writer

Atlanta Business Chronicle

Excerpts from the article:

Some of the Georgia’s largest hospitals could face multimillion-dollar losses in Medicare reimbursements, if a new federal investigation finds surgeons do not follow guidelines for patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators. 
The review will determine whether hospitals followed National Coverage Decision (NCD) criteria in determining who should receive the small battery-powered electrical impulse generator. The devices, which cost upward of $35,000 each, detect an abnormal heart rhythm that can cause sudden cardiac death, and then fire an electric jolt to restore a normal heart beat....
The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sets specific guidelines that prohibit the devices being implanted if the patient has received other types of treatments or procedures prior to the surgery, according to Rebekah Plowman, a partner in the Atlanta office of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP and chair of the firm’s fraud and abuse practice. 
“The government found it was pretty easy to go out and use data mining techniques to see if they or any other hospital had billed for codes associated with a heart attack or other [prohibited] procedure,” [Emphasis & color mine] said Plowman. “Then they send a letter to the hospital asking why we shouldn’t collect the fees we paid back from you.”
The NCD criteria prohibits hospitals implanting the device in patients who have had a heart attack within the last 40 days or undergone procedures such as balloon angioplasty or open-heart surgery within the past 90 days. [Again, emphasis & color mine] [Really?  They just assume that every patient fits this template does not get this procedure?]
...
With the potential for losses so high, hospitals have an incentive to fight the claims.
“What hospitals are doing is hiring lawyers to put everything under attorney-client privilege and then hiring consultants to review the medical records,” said Plowman.
...
Critics of the CMS review contend that its guidelines for when a defibrillator can be implanted, which were issued in 2003, are out of date and haven’t kept up with research. Others point to evidence that doctors implant too many of the devices without regard to evidence-based guidelines that result in medical complications.
A recent Duke University study found that surgeons often strayed from the evidence-based guidelines for when defibrillators should be implanted. Those cases that did not follow the professional recommendations were more likely to produce in-hospital complications and even death.
...

Chicago style "poly-ticks".....

Michelle Malkin

All the President's Funny Money

Townhall.com 

Ka-ching, ka-ching, ka-ching. President Obama's perpetual campaign cash-o-matic machine kicks into high gear again this week as the celebrity-in-chief heads to Hollywood for several high-priced fundraisers. But while the Democrats' 2012 re-election team stuffs its hands into every liberal deep pocket in sight, questions about the Obama 2008 campaign finance operation still fester. 
Last week, the laggard watchdogs at the Federal Election Commission announced an audit of the Obama 2008 campaign committee -- which raised a record-setting $750 million. White House flacks are downplaying the probe as a "routine review." 
But there's nothing routine about the nearly $3 million Obama has spent on legal expenses to address federal campaign finance irregularities and inquiries. Roll Call reports that Obama's campaign legal fees have exceeded all other House and presidential campaign committees, including members of Congress under ethics investigations. 
There's nothing routine about the whopping $6 million that Team Obama has refunded to individual donors since Obama took office. 
And there's nothing routine about the 26 warning letters to Obama for America totaling "more than 1,500 pages of questions and data that outlined compliance concerns -- including the longest one ever sent to a presidential candidate," according to Roll Call.
She goes on to describe some of the worst offenses of his campaign contributors, but you know none of this will make the Daily Show.  And if doesn't make the Daily Show, how will any of the Obamaites learn about how crooked he really is..?  I'm just sayin'....

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

I love Thomas Sowell's writing...



Thomas Sowell 

Taxes and Politics

Here are some great excerpts:



...  We may think of taxes as just a source of government revenue. But tax rates are a big political statement on the left, whether they bring in any revenue or not.
For more than 80 years, the political left has opposed what they call "tax cuts for the rich." But big cuts in very high tax rates ended up bringing in more revenue to the government in the Coolidge, Kennedy, Reagan and Bush 43 administrations. This included more-- repeat, more-- tax revenue from people in the highest income brackets than before. 
...  After all, "the rich" paid that larger sum of taxes only because their incomes had risen. Their paying a higher share of all taxes doesn't matter to the "progressives," who see high tax rates as a way to take a bigger bite out of the incomes of higher-income people, not just provide more revenue to the government. 
Tax rates are meant to make an ideological statement and promote class-warfare politics, not just bring in revenue. 
....Internal Revenue Service data show that the income of people who were in the lowest income tax bracket in 1996 rose by 91 percent by 2005. But people in the "top one percent" had their incomes drop by 26 percent in those same years. 
There is nothing complicated about this. Most people simply start at the bottom when they are young and their pay rises as they get more experience. Most people in the top one percent are there for only a single year when they happen to have a spike in income. They too are not an enduring class.

Monday, April 11, 2011

More Journalistic Malpractice

Obama to set out budget plan on Wednesday
AFPApril 11, 2011, 8:18 am

Here is all you need to read to know how disingenuous this so-called journalist is:

"Republicans want to slash funds for Medicare, benefits for the elderly, and Medicaid, a health program for people with low income, but Democrats would prefer to make up much of the deficit by raising taxes on the wealthy."

Really?  Is that what the Republicans are proposing?  Medicare "cuts".  Only D.C. politicians and the minions in the MSM can get away with such blatant lies...  There are no "cuts" proposed for people on medicare/medicaid.  They are simply lowering the rate of growth and changes qualifications to means test it, so people like me will not be able to access the "free healthcare" after paying in all these years.  You know what?  I don't care because the country cannot afford it!!!!


And Democrats only raise taxes on the "wealthy".  Really?  That is unless you eat, drink, smoke, use electricity, gasoline, or have a cell phone, credit cards, a bank account or home mortgage.  Then your taxes, either directly or indirectly are going up as well.


What about this do people not understand.  We spend $10,000,000,000 a DAY.  $4,000,000,000 of that is borrowed!  Most of that is borrowed from other countries.  Are people really so stupid, as to believe we can continue this absurd behavior?

Tuesday, April 05, 2011

Adult conversation

This is how adults talk about the real problems facing our country.  No talk about cowboy poetry or other useless government programs....  FINALLY!!!


Friday, April 01, 2011

Moron Alert...

I'll be the first to admit, up until the last couple years I neither knew, nor cared to know who Paul Krugman was...  But, since the economy tanked and Obama took over, it seems as though the Obama administration has been following his playbook, albeit with a couple less zero's behind his recommendations.  And now Krugman is clamoring for even more spending:




The Mellon Doctrine




I know he's one of the "smartest men in the room" people, but someone ought to tell him the emperor has no clothes.  His plans are worse than moronic, they are downright dangerous, if only because for some idiotic reason people listen to him.  I guess he must have failed as a financial planner (er, sorry "wealth manager") so he thought he'd try his hand at economics.


Here is but one small sample of how out of touch this guy is...:


"....why would lower wages promote higher employment?"


Really, he said that.  Worse yet, he WROTE that, by which I mean he might have thought it in a flash, but anyone with a half a brain would have realized how nonsensical it would have sounded and thought better about actually saying it (i.e., better to not say anything and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt).  But, no he actually pecked out that sentence on a computer and one would assume he proof read it before submitting it, so he likely wrote and read it (at least once).  And yet, he allowed that sentence to be published.



I don't want to insult anyone's intelligence by pointing out that higher wages do, in fact, lead to higher unemployment, especially among entry level employees, so I won't.  I also won't point out that if a business doesn't have to pay each employee as much per person, they might actually be able to afford to hire a couple more people and those couple more people would generate even more revenue.  And that the greater revenue might lead to greater profit and eventually expansion and the creation of even more jobs...   No, I don't want to insult anyone who might read this by pointing out such a simple, basic,  business principle as that!

 



I can only think of one thing when I read that column.  Moron.  

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Why is what Herman Cain said considered controversial?


Herman Cain May Sneak Up On 2012 GOP Primary Field If He Doesn't Trip Himself Up First

Huffington-Puffington Post/AOL News Service....

They say what Herman Cain said is a blunder.  Listen to what he said and you tell me if it's a blunder:

He was asked Saturday if he would feel comfortable appointing a Muslim to his Cabinet or to a federal judgeship.

"I will not," he said. "And here's why. There is this creeping attempt, this attempt, to gradually ease Sharia law and the Muslim faith into our government," Cain said. "It does not belong in our government. This is what happened to Europe. And little by little, to try to be politically correct, they made this little change. They made this little change. And now they've got a social problem that they don't know what to do with hardly."

Now, if he lived in a world where every time a radical Muslim suicide bomber blow herself up at bus station/train station/open air market/night club, "moderate" Muslims would publicly excoriate the radicals as extremists, then it might be a little "un-PC".  But, as of right now there are very few publicly "moderate" Muslim's and those who do exist are not very forceful.  I assume they are afraid, after witnessing how a Salman Rushdie or a Theo Van Gogh gets treated in the peaceful religion of Islam.




The bottom line is. "Is what Herman Cain said true or false?"  Is say it's true and he ought to be held to that standard - none other.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Victor David Hansen nails it, again....

Our President, the man-child, least qualified person in any room he walks into, is so devoid of leadership ability it makes one wonder how he will ever handle being such a young ex-president in 2013....



President Hamlet 

Victor Davis Hanson 


...now Obama is chief executive, and learning, as did Prince Hamlet, that thinking out every possible side of a question can mean never acting on any of them -- a sort of Shakespearean "prison" where "there is nothing either good or bad." Worrying about pleasing everyone ensures pleasing no one. Once again such "conscious does make cowards of us all."

Hamlets, past and present, are as admirable in theory as they are fickle -- and often dangerous -- in fact.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Why do I think the Libyan rebels aren't comforted...


SARKOZY FILLS LEADERSHIP VOID ON LIBYA 
France formally recognises Libyan rebels' authority
France became the first country to formally recognize the rebels’ newly created Interim Governing Council, saying it planned to exchange ambassadors after President Nicolas Sarkozy met with two representatives of the group based in the eastern Libyan city of Benghazi.

Way to lead Obama!  Of course, when you believe you were elected to manage the decline of the U.S., you probably feel you are showing leadership when you abdicate your role as "leader of the [formerly] free world"....

It's a sad, sad day....

Monday, February 28, 2011

Oh, Christmas Tree....

So there is a new pig poking it's head in the public trough.   The Christmas Tree consortium now wants the government to tax Christmas Trees so they can market - wait for it - Christmas trees.  Yep, apparently their attempt to voluntarily form organizations to market trees them selves failed, so they need the ever compassionate Big Government helping hand to get Christmas Tree growers the money they need to effectively market their product.


What's next, a diaper consortium?  (I shouldn't have said anything....)

Friday, February 25, 2011

Collectivist Tyranny - Alexander's Essays - PatriotPost.US

Collectivist Tyranny - Alexander's Essays - PatriotPost.US


As per usual, Alexander nail's it.  The Patriot Post is the most consistently great source of conservative news, views and humor.  If you are not already, you really ought to join.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Here is a great summary of the latest union statistics by the BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics)

Highlights (in my humble opinion):

1. In 2010, the union membership rate--the percent of wage and salary workers who were members of a union--was 11.9 percent, down from 12.3 percent a year earlier.

2. The number of wage and salary workers belonging to unions declined by 612,000 to 14.7 million. In 1983, the first year for which comparable union data are available, the union membership rate was 20.1 percent, and there were 17.7 million union workers.

3. The union membership rate for public sector workers (36.2 percent) was substantially higher than the rate for private sector workers (6.9 percent).

4. Workers in education, training, and library occupations had the highest unionization rate at 37.1 percent.

5. In 2010, 7.6 million public sector employees belonged to a union, compared with 7.1 million union workers in the private sector.

6. The union membership rate for public sector workers (36.2 percent) was substantially higher than the rate for private sector workers (6.9 percent). Within the public sector, local government workers had the highest union membership rate, 42.3 percent.

7. Among these occupational groups: education, training, and library occupations (37.1 percent) and protective service occupations (34.1 percent) had the highest unionization rates in 2010.

8. The largest numbers of union members lived in California (2.4 million) and New York (2.0 million). About half of the 14.7 million union members in the U.S. lived in just six states (California, 2.4 million; New York, 2.0 million; Illinois, 0.8 million; Pennsylvania, 0.8 million; Ohio, 0.7 million; and New Jersey, 0.6 million), though these states accounted for only one-third of wage and salary employment nationally.

9. Texas had about one-fourth as many union members as New York, despite having 1.9 million more wage and salary employees. Similarly, North Carolina and Hawaii had comparable numbers of union members (117,000 and 111,000, respectively), though North Carolina's wage and salary employment level (3.7 million) was about seven times that of Hawaii (511,000).



Note a couple things:
- Unions are losing membership in the private sector. In fact, they have decreased to record low numbers in the private sector where they negotiate with management of for-profit companies for a piece of the profit gained through higher compensation.
- Unions are gaining membership in the public sector. In the public sector unions negotiate with who for higher compensation? They negotiate with the same government representatives they help elect. And for what? A greater piece of taxpayer money. It is my contention that it is this simple fact that has kept this gravy train going.
- Did you notice the states with the highest percentage of union representation? These are the states with the highest tax burdens and the states who are in the most dire of financial situations. Do you really believe governor "moon beam" is going to take on Richard Trumpka?
- Did you notice the states with the least representation? I don't believe it is a coincidence these are the sates to which businesses are moving. It is no coincidence that BMW, Mercedes, Hyundai, Kia and Toyota have all built new plants in right to work states in last decade.

Summary
Unions are driving businesses into the ground. They certainly played a pivotal role in our country's history. However, since the early days of unions, he now have a plethora of government agencies enforcing workers safety (OSHA), worker rights (EEOC) and environmental protection (EPA). The era of big union in the U.S. is over. They know it is over in the private sector and they are scared to death it is dying a slow death in the public sector, beginning in Wisconsin this year.

These leaders are freaking out that they may not be able to continue to earn their incredible salaries or buy their way into the White House if their membership continues to dwindle. Hence, you get them "Organizing Against American the American Taxpayer" and ground zero is Madison, Wisconsin the birthplace of AFSCME. Oh, the irony...

Here's a run down of articles regarding the unholy alliance of public sector unions and government.

Ann Coulter
Look for the Union Fable

How Politicians and Union Leaders Have Scammed Taxpayers and Public Employees
By Steve Chapman
Chicago Tribune

Michael Barone
Public Unions Force Taxpayers to Fund Dems

Steve Chapman
How Public Employees and Taxpayers Got Scammed

EDWARD MORRISSEY
The real threat to democracy in Wisconsin

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Col. West Schools CAIR's Executive Director in Islam...

Wow... Col. West takes it to Nezar Hamze, Executive Director of the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR)



Maybe we have finally got some real leaders in the GOP...

Monday, February 21, 2011

golfingbud: A Political History of African Americans in the US...

This is great recap of the history of blacks in the U.S. as represented by the facts, not the history books....

golfingbud: A Political History of African Americans in the US...: "A Political History of African Americans in the United States This is an attempt to provide an accurate political history of African America..."

Friday, February 18, 2011

Herman Cain, the GOP Wild Card - The Atlantic

Herman Cain, the GOP Wild Card - The Atlantic

....

Are we doomed to a dull campaign? Not if the Hermanator has his way.

If you don’t attend Tea Party rallies or listen to political talk radio, the name Herman Cain may not register. Cain intends to rectify that. He’s planning to seek the GOP nomination, so he’s spreading his blustery, relentlessly upbeat right-wing social and economic message, which can be heard weeknights from 7 to 10 on WSB in Atlanta. Cain is so exuberantly confident of his message that he has upgraded its status: he bestows upon audiences not speeches or talking points but “The Hermanator Experience.” He’s even trademarked the phrase.

.....

His entrance into national politics was a fluke—albeit, if he runs, an enormously beneficial one. In 1994, Cain, then still CEO of Godfather’s Pizza, participated in a town-hall meeting that Bill Clinton held to drum up support for his flagging health-care plan. He challenged the president’s claim that restaurateurs would bear only a marginal new cost. Clinton objected, but Cain wouldn’t relent. “I’d had my financial people run the numbers,” he told me. The Wall Street Journal published them, and after Clinton’s plan collapsed, Newsweek identified Cain as one of its “saboteurs”—a badge of honor, especially among conservatives today.


Wednesday, February 16, 2011

What to get freaked out about the size our debt?

Then you need to check this out.

Here's the video:



Here's some interesting facts:

We do not have a good frame of reference to understand the concept of a trillion. Professor Davies shared the following analogy to provide a frame of reference we can understand.

If the Federal government were scaled down to the size of the average US household, here’s what its finances would look like:

The Federal government would earn $50,000 a year in tax revenue (the same as the average US household).

It would be $325,000 in debt.
It would pay almost $10,000 a year in interest on that debt.
Last year, it would have spent $79,000.
This year, it is hoping to spend $86,000.
The $100 billion in spending cuts (that some politicians view as draconian) would be equivalent to the household cutting its $86,000 in planned spending down to a mere $83,700.
Not a bad start, but the household has another $33,700 to go before it balances its budget.

Environmentalist Smack-down

Classic

Wisconsin going 'right-wing'. Who'd a thunk...?

I am not sure which is more laughable:
1) That they think this is remotely comparable to Eygpt
2) The three chinned union thug saying he was going to try to get his sign back



Of course, there is always the beauty of the ignorant youth and the teachers who teach them...

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

The truth about Eygpt....

Egypt: The Distance Between Enthusiasm and Reality is republished with permission of STRATFOR.

You need to read the entire article, but the conclusion is quite good:

The week began with an old soldier running Egypt. It ended with different old soldiers running Egypt with even more formal power than Mubarak had. This has caused worldwide shock and awe. We were killjoys in 2009, when we said the Iranian revolution wasn’t going anywhere. We do not want to be killjoys now, since everyone is so excited and happy. But we should point out that, in spite of the crowds, nothing much has really happened yet in Egypt. It doesn’t mean that it won’t, but it hasn’t yet.

An 82-year-old man has been thrown out of office, and his son will not be president. The constitution and parliament are gone and a military junta is in charge. The rest is speculation.


I like everyone's idealism, but the facts are the facts....

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Sadly, our State Department also seems to have a bad case of denial...

DNI Clapper: Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood 'largely secular'
POLITICO
Josh Gerstein
February 10, 2011

During a House Intelligence Committee hearing Thursday, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper called Egypt's branch of the Muslim Brotherhood movement "largely secular."

In response to questioning from Rep. Sue Myrick (R-N.C.) about the threat posed by the group, Clapper suggested that the Egyptian part of the Brotherhood is not particularly extreme and that the broader international movement is hard to generalize about.

"The term 'Muslim Brotherhood'...is an umbrella term for a variety of movements, in the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried Al Qaeda as a perversion of Islam," Clapper said. "They have pursued social ends, a betterment of the political order in Egypt, et cetera.....In other countries, there are also chapters or franchises of the Muslim Brotherhood, but there is no overarching agenda, particularly in pursuit of violence, at least internationally."

The Brotherhood uses the slogan, "Islam is the answer," and generally advocates for government in accordance with Islamic principles. The movement has as a broad goal unifying what it perceives as Muslim lands, from Spain to Indonesia, as a "caliphate."

Myrick interrupted Clapper at one point, saying her concern isn't simply with the violence but with the Brotherhood's beliefs regarding government.

"The danger of the Muslim Brotherhood is not just encouraging terrorism through their ideology, but also trying to take over government, so everyone has to succumb and live under their ideology," Myrick said.

Clapper said later in the hearing that the Brotherhood in Egypt runs 29 hospitals "not under the guise of an extremist agenda." He said the group fills a vacuum caused by the absence of government services, but added, "It is not necessarily with a view to promoting violence or overthrow of the state."

FBI Director Robert Mueller said some branches of the Brotherhood have engaged in violence, but he declined to go into detail in a public session. "Obviously, elements of the Muslim Brotherhood here and overseas have supported terrorism," he said.

Hamas, which is designated by the U.S. as a terrorist group but also runs the elected government in the Gaza strip, is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. U.S. prosecutors have also produced evidence that some Islamic organizations in America, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the Islamic Society of North America and the North American Islamic Trust, grew out of the Brotherhood.

I quake with fear when I think how incompetent our government is... Thank God we have a military that can get us out of the messes in which the politicos put us.

The radical Islam deniers at it again....



But I would expect no less from the the likes of MSN"BS"C....

More effects of BHO/"Uncle Ben" Bernanke/"Lil' Timmy" Geithner Policies

Get Ready for Higher Food Prices
2011 The Omaha World Herald.
By David Hendee
WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER
February 10, 2011

Note: Emphasis added by me...

Warnings of higher food prices headed for American supermarkets and restaurants were swallowed easily across much of farm country Wednesday.

The big gulp came when the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported that global demand had pushed U.S. corn supplies to their lowest point in 15 years.

The price of corn, which has doubled over the past six months, affects most food products in supermarkets. It's used to feed the cattle, hogs and chickens that fill the meat aisles.

It is the main ingredient in Cap'n Crunch and Doritos. Turned into syrup, it sweetens most soft drinks and many foods.

Corn also is part of the agricultural blend that fuels the economies of Nebraska, Iowa and other farming states. Iowa is the nation's top corn-producing state; Nebraska is third.

Shoppers could see higher grocery bills as early as three months from now, though most of the impact won't be felt for another six months, said Scott Irwin, an agricultural economics professor at the University of Illinois.

Chicken prices are among the first to rise because the bird's life span is so short that higher feed costs get factored in quickly, he said. Price hikes for hogs take about a year and cattle two years. Prices on packaged foods take six or seven months to rise.

Tyson Foods, the nation's biggest meat company, said chicken, beef and pork prices are expect to rise this year, if only slightly, as producers seek to cover costs.

ConAgra Foods Inc. — the Omaha-based producer of brands including Healthy Choice, Banquet and Chef Boyardee — is raising prices on some of its products because of higher costs for corn and fuel, said Teresa Paulsen, a spokeswoman.

The price rally has bolstered the financial fitness of America's crop and livestock operators over the past eight months. Midwestern cropland is yielding record values. Rural banks and equipment makers report record profits.

“We're seeing record income levels for the ag community and ... wealth accumulation that cannot be denied,” said Bruce Johnson, an agricultural economist at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. “We've moved into a whole new level.”

Said Bruce Babcock, an agricultural economist at Iowa State University: “Farmers are going to be earning quite a bit more money.”

Jason Henderson, Omaha branch executive for the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, said farmers are buying more tractors, pickup trucks, grain bins and land.

“And they also come to Omaha to shop and go to events,” he said.

But it hasn't been simply a spending spree, Henderson said. Farmers are paying down debt and fewer are seeking loan renewals or extensions.

“It's a good time to be an ag banker,” said Brian Esch, president of McCook National Bank in southwest Nebraska. “But I have concerns over what this means for consumers. If one guy is selling at a record profit, someone is buying at a record level.”

Corn prices have risen over the past six months from $3.50 a bushel to nearly $7.

The U.S. will have a reserve of 675 million bushels left over in late August, when this year's harvest begins. That's roughly 5 percent of all corn that will be consumed, the lowest surplus level since 1996.

“There is going to be enough corn for food, for feed, for fuel and for export opportunities,” Tom Vilsack, the U.S. agriculture secretary, said at a Washington press conference.

Babcock, the Iowa State economist, said the U.S. mandate to increase the use of renewable fuels like ethanol is a major reason why the nation's corn supply is so low. About a quarter of the nation's corn crop is consumed by the production of ethanol. The ethanol industry's projected corn orders this year have risen 8 percent, to 13 billion bushels, after record-high production in December and January, USDA said.

“We've created a hungry business that is dependent on corn, even high-priced corn,” Babcock said.

Johnson, the UNL economist, said global supply and demand are the root causes behind low U.S. corn stocks.

“Ethanol is a factor, but it's not the driver,” he said.

Johnson said the declining value of the dollar not only has fueled greater agricultural export demand, but also has driven up the price of oil. That, in turn, has propelled higher prices for corn-based ethanol.

The agricultural economies of Nebraska and Iowa will continue to grow into greater prominence as global food providers, economists said.

Johnson said rising population numbers globally and greater demand in major developing countries for higher-protein diets have strengthened the Midlands' agricultural market.

Farm cash receipts — led by corn and other crops — doubled in Nebraska from 2000 through 2010. Crop receipts alone ended the decade in the $9 billion range, up from a 2000 total of $3 billion.

Nebraska's net farm income hit a record $4.25 billion last year, according to preliminary estimates. The 2010 level would be nearly 65 percent above the 10-year historical average, Johnson said.

Although farm income represents only about 6 percent of Nebraska's $75 billion personal income total, it has a major impact on local and regional economies, Johnson said.

“There is no question that agriculture buffered the state from going into a deeper recession these last few years, and it has helped pull us out of the recession faster than other areas,” he said. “Agriculture has been our pack horse.”

Wednesday, February 09, 2011

I'm sure this has no relation to the HUGE increase in Spain's socialistic tendencies

Public release date: 9-Feb-2011
FECYT - Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology
Young people now take longer to join adult life

A research study by the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), in collaboration with the State University of Campinas (Brazil), shows that young Spanish people were by 2001 taking six years longer than in 1981 to reach full employment, residential and family independence.

Spain considers itself to be a "family-centred" country, in other words, families are expected to take up the slack with regard to areas not covered by social security. "The objective was to evaluate transformations in the trends of how young people gained their independence in Spain over the last decades of the 20th Century", Pau Miret Gamundi, a researcher at the UAB Centre for Demographic Studies, tells SINC.

The transition from youth to adult life can be broken down into three key stages – the passage from student life to the world of work (joining the labour market), from a dependent member of the household to a leading figure within it (residential emancipation), and from a position of being exclusively a child to being a parent (formation of family).

"Our results show there has been a significant change in the age at which the most intense status changes take place, which were six years later in 2001 than in 1981", says Miret, who is a co-author of the study, which has been published in the journal REIS.

This time lag has been the same for both sexes. In 1981, the average age at which young people gained full independence was 22 for females and 24 for males, while this age had risen by 2001 to 28 and 30, respectively. "These ages, in comparison with other geographical locations outside southern Europe, are considered to be extraordinarily late", the researcher explains.

No regional differences can be appreciated with regard to different autonomous communities "as we showed in the detailed study of particular cases in Catalonia – which is representative of an urban, industrialised setting – and Galicia, which is more rural". When the two regions were compared, the researchers found the results converged towards identical patterns of independence.

The study is based on data from the Spanish censuses for this period, which were provided by the University of Minnesota (USA), as part of a project that is attempting to collect census data from as many countries as possible. The next census that will allow further calculations to be made of the transition to adult life will be carried out in 2011.

Crises exacerbate the situation

The 1973 recession is considered to be one of the reasons for the growth in university education in the 1970s. "The constant sensation of instability makes it hard for young people to achieve full autonomy and residential independence", say the authors.

The experts say investment in education "is part of the dynamic of the labour market", in other words, young people prolong their studies in the hope of increasing their career opportunities, putting their other personal plans on the back burner.

"Policies regarding young people are not usually a priority and are the last to be implemented. The independence grants that the Government is providing are a favourable policy for helping resolve this problem, but it would also be interesting to be able to provide access to subsidised rent for housing, not necessarily for single-occupancy flats, but flats shared by three or four people", Miret concludes.

I cannot imagine anyone is surprised, are they?

Who is going to hijack the Egypt movement...?



Or, will it be:

Muslim Brotherhood text reveals scope of radical creed
The Jerusalem Post
By OREN KESSLER
02/09/2011 02:09

Translated by Palestinian Media Watch, book details group’s goal of global Islamic conquest.

On Tuesday, two Brotherhood representatives participated in an opposition delegation that met with Vice President Omar Suleiman for the first set of talks over implementing political reforms.

Pundits have portrayed the Brotherhood as uncompromising zealots or beneficent providers of social services that long-deprived Egyptians desperately need.

But a translation released Tuesday of a 1995 book by the movement’s fifth official leader sheds light on just how Egypt’s Brotherhood views itself and its mission. Jihad is the Way is the last of a five-volume work, The Laws of Da’wa by Mustafa Mashhur, who headed the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt from 1996-2002.



Or will it be:

Islamic Socialism Political System?

A number of Muslim leaders who relate Islam and Socialism in the political system usually use the term Islamic Socialism to describe the system. They combine the principles of Socialism with the spirituality of Islam in the system. Muslim socialists consider the principles of Socialism, such as redistribution of wealth and equality, are in accordance with the teachings of Prophet Muhammad and the Holy Qur’an.


Or will it simply be a combination of all of the above?

Why are we having this conversation to begin with...?

Ryan confronts Bernanke over Fed’s purchases of U.S. debt, raises concerns about the dollar
By Jon Ward
The Daily Caller
Published: 11:01 AM 02/09/2011
Updated: 4:49 PM 02/09/2011
Why don't we simply abolish the Fed?

Everyone is under the impression that the "Federal Reserve" part of the U.S. government, when in fact it is a private entity allowed to exist by the The Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Constitutionally, the money supply is the responsibility of congress and was until 1913.

We should not even be having this conversation.

My take on Egypt....

Wrongly choosing Egypt's generals over the democrats
The Washington Post
Monday, February 7, 2011; 8:09 PM

I have to say I disagree with this article (big surprise).

Here's a book you ought to read: "The Next Decade" by George Friedman. I'm about 2/3 done with it. As I am reading it I feel like a president reading an analysis compiled by the CIA or NSA. The world is very large chess game and the president's job #1 is to protect America'a interests abroad. Sadly, that sometimes means allowing autocracies like Egypt's to exist far too long.

Egypt's history is one of the longest in the world and it a tangled web of disparate groups/tribes. The cold hard facts are that Egypt has lived peacefully alongside Israel for nearly 40 years, which has allowed the U.S. the time to win the cold war without getting distracted by less essential battles elsewhere. In the long run, it will be Turkey that holds the key to "peace" - such as it can exist - in the middle east.

I hope we do not get dragged to far into the weeds in Egypt. This man-child president is ill prepared for many more weighty decisions. If Egypt falls under the control of the Muslim Brotherhood, it'll be much worse for the citizens than the regime they live under now. Sadly, these teens & 20 somethings protesting in the streets are but pawns in chess game that cannot end good for them. It's painful to watch.....

Monday, February 07, 2011

Education dissected...

This is a great (and creative) presentation on education:



I believe if we are ever going to leap frog over other civilizations by getting ourselves out of the mess we are in and REALLY ensuring we don't get back into this mess again, it's going to take a massive overhaul of our education system. (Side note: education is only one of many things that need to be overhauled and certainly not the first, but is in the top 5) As someone who makes a living transforming manufacturing companies in a manner similar to what we discusses, I can tell you he is spot on.

Here are some more things to think about. When you benchmark the results of our public education system against the rest of the world, we are average at best. Asian countries always come in at or near the top in subjects like math and science. But, these results are measured largely the same way in which we measure our students - my metrics that are questionable to begin with.

If we suck so bad at education, why do so many Asian countries send their students over here to go to school? If we suck this bad at education, why are these countries studying our education system? The answer is simple. Because as dysfunctional as it is, it still has the tendency (for now anyway) to produce people who are more creative in their approach to solving problems where there are multiple answers than nearly anywhere else on the planet. In one of Malcolm Gladwell's books he compares the opportunities that where given to Bill Gates with some other guy (whose name if forget) who tested much higher on the IQ scale. The opportunities provided to Bill Gates were coincidental, like availability to rent time on large mainframe computer as a child and his parents did not keep him in a box (they allowed him to go pursue his crazy passion for computers). The other guy? He had road block after road block placed in front of him until he finally gave up. My point being is that here in the U.S., in spite of an educational system designed like a factory, when kids are in home environments where they are allowed (encouraged, actually) to pursue their passions and allowed to explore all their options they learn to think.

I currently have a lovely Asian international student living with us. She is a prime example of this theory. She is "acing" all her subjects where memorization is key (math, chemistry, languages, etc...). But, in real life, she gets an 'F'. She rarely plans further ahead than tomorrows or next week’s assignments. She shows little curiosity about other people. She never thinks to ask, "Why?" I love her, but sometimes I'd like to scream with her lack of curiosity about things outside academia.

It's like Rush always says. We have the same basic DNA as the rest of the people on the planet, so why are we so much further ahead than other countries? I would say simply, it is because, in spite of an education system that tries to create little robots out of us, we are largely unconstrained in our creativity of problem solving.

Imagine how much further ahead we would be if our children grew up in an education system that did not try to put us in a box. Imagine if we were allowed to learn at our own pace and pursue our own passions from the earliest age. Imagine if kids did not have to learn things that would never provide value later in their life, but were allowed to absorb everything they could about subjects where they excelled. Imagine how much more advanced we’d be…

Friday, February 04, 2011

So why aren't we drilling?

The Interior Department's Culture of Contempt
Michelle Malkin
townhall.com

Read the article, then think about what is going to happen to the price of oil when the Muslim Brotherhood gets it hands on the Suez Canal. Think about it. Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, Yemen and Sudan added to Iran, Syria, and Lebanon. How long until Saudi Arabia falls? Once a caliphate is created the return of the Muslim controlled Ottoman Empire is complete. Do you suppose they'll be anxious to sell oil to people whose heads they would prefer to cut off?

So you think all this is crazy talk from Glenn Beck, right? What about this guy? George Friedman and his organization, Statfor have come to largely the same conclusions. Does the CIA think he's crazy? Because they hire Stratfor to supply them with information.

Now more than ever, we need to drill. We need to drill in the gulf, in the Dakota's, in ANWR, off the California coast, off the Atlantic coast, where ever we can find oil, we need to go get it.

Unfortunately we have a wet noodle for a president who couldn't lead his way out of paper bag. Where is the presidential leadership on this issue?

Could it be that BHO wants oil prices to be higher?

Why is Obama blocking permits?

We already know BHO wants higher energy prices...